Is the sensible an illusion? The revisited ontology of the Sophist

Autores

  • Luca Pitteloud

Resumo

In this paper we argue that, in the Sophist, Plato provides the reader some elements about a revision of his ontology behind the discussion about the nature of non-being. We would want to show that the analysis of the notion of image gives some indications concerning the nature of the sensible, which is usually described as an image of the intelligible.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Luca Pitteloud

Luca Pitteloud
UnB – Archai UNESCO Chair, Brasília
November 28-29, 2013, João Pessoa, UFPB

Referências

Ackrill, J. L. (1957). Plato and the Copula: Sophist 251-259. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 77, 1–6.

Brown, L. (1986). Being in the Sophist. A Syntactical Enquiry. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 4, 49-70.

Campbell, L. (2007). The Sophistes and Politicus of Plato: With a revised text and English notes (1867). Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishing, Llc.

Cordero, N. L. (1993). Sophiste. Paris: GF Flammarion.

Frede, M. (1967). Prädikation und Existenzaussage: Platons Gebrauch von «… ist …» und «… ist nicht …» im Sophistes. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Kahn, C. (2003). The Verb «be» in Ancient Greek: With a new introductory essay. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub. Co.

Leigh, F. (2007). The Copula and Semantic Sontinuity in Plato's Sophist. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 34, 105-121.

Malcolm, J. (2006). Some Cautionary Remarks on the «is»/_«teach» Analogy. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 31, 281–296.

Owen, G. E. L., & Nussbaum, M. C. (1986). Logic, Science, and Dialectic: Collected papers in Greek philosophy (1. publ.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Pr.

Arquivos adicionais

Publicado

2014-04-04

Como Citar

Pitteloud, L. (2014). Is the sensible an illusion? The revisited ontology of the Sophist. Aufklärung: Journal of Philosophy, 1(1), p.21–32. Recuperado de https://www.periodicos.ufpb.br/ojs2/index.php/arf/article/view/18834